Casual Friday: Bleed as One
March 12, 2010 · Leave a Comment
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Andy · Pop Culture
Cultural assumptions and house prices
March 11, 2010 · 1 Comment
Ramit Sethi (author of the personal finance book “I Will Teach You To Be Rich”) makes the argument that falling house prices are not necessarily a bad thing. Here’s an excerpt:
Isn’t it funny how “home prices falling” is assumed to be a bad thing?
You never know how American your assumptions are until you go to another country. That’s because in the United States, we have been systematically taught that housing is a good investment and that prices must go up. Ask your parents why they bought their house. One of the top 3 reasons will almost certainly be, “It was a good investment.” Yet I’ve shown very clearly that for many people in many situations, it is not. In fact, housing is often a terrible investment.
Yet the illusion persists, whether it’s my friend wanting to buy a million-dollar house with no research, or people saying things like, “I wish I’d bought more real estate” after incurring a paltry 1.2% return rate over several decades.
As a result, you get media reports that implicitly echo the cultural assumption that housing is a good investment. The way they describe the housing market — oops, “housing recovery” — influences and reflects our cultural assumption. Let’s take a look at a headline from a major national news publication:
Interesting…it’s a “housing recovery” when prices are getting expensive. Would you say that with toothpaste?
You can check out the rest of the post here.
→ 1 CommentCategories: Jeff
Higher education budget cuts in relative space
March 8, 2010 · Leave a Comment
Tax Prof Blog has an interesting post on school budget cuts; here’s an excerpt:
- 32.6% of faculty had their salaries reduced, with a median decrease of 3%
- 21.2% of faculty had their salaries frozen
- 46.2% of faculty had their salaries increased, with a median increase of 3%
- 8.3% of administrators had their salaries reduced
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Academia · Jeff
Casual Friday: Fleemco!
March 5, 2010 · Leave a Comment
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Andy · Pop Culture
Post doc opportunity in Brussels
March 1, 2010 · Leave a Comment
This one may be a bit of a stretch for a Law & Courts pol sci candidate and certainly having a JD would make it more viable … along with having some French language capability. [H/T Conflict of Laws Net] Keep reading →
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Jeff
US politics in cigars
February 28, 2010 · Leave a Comment

We need one of these for cigarettes
[H/T Buzzfeed]
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Jeff · Pop Culture · politics
CFP: Social Conflict and Simulation Methods
February 27, 2010 · Leave a Comment
In the mail:
—————————————————————————————————
Call for Papers: Social Conflict and Social Simulation panel at World Congress on Social Simulation
—————————————————————————————————
We kindly invite you to submit a paper to the Special Interest Group Social Conflict and Social Simulation (SIG-SCSS) panel at the 2010 World Congress on Social Simulation (WCSS). As in the last two years we welcome papers that are thematically relevant to social conflict and social simulation in general. Papers will be double-blind peer-reviewed. Outstanding submissions will be selected to be published as a book chapter in the WCSS proceedings.We expect full papers to be submitted no later than 1 May 2010. Papers shall not exceed 8 pages in length. Detailed submission guidelines can be found on the WCSS 2010 website (http://www.usf.uni-kassel.de/wcss2010/guidelines.php). To indicate submission of your paper for this panel, check the ‘I.4 conflict and cooperation’-box when asked to chose your topic.
For questions please contact Nanda Wijermans (F.E.H.Wijermans@rug.nl)
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Academia · Andy · Conferences
Casual Friday: 1.618
February 26, 2010 · Leave a Comment
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Andy · Pop Culture
Postdoctoral Fellow opportunity
February 26, 2010 · Leave a Comment
Hat tip to Rogers Smith on the Law and Courts Listserve: Keep reading →
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Jeff
RFA: Rotary Peace Fellows
February 24, 2010 · Leave a Comment
Free money!
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Andy · Grants
Research position available for PhD, JD, or MA
February 23, 2010 · Leave a Comment
From the Law and Courts listserve:
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY invites applications for a Research Associate position in the Center for Justice, Law and Society. This is a fixed term, 1-year appointment, not applicable to tenure. Possibility of renewal.
The associate will serve as coordinator of the Center’s federally-funded Wrongful Conviction Project, applying social science methods to understand the sources of wrongful conviction cases. Duties will include project management, research, data collection and management, report drafting, and the supervision of three graduate research assistants. Position may require national travel.
Requirements: master’s or law degree, although a Ph.D. would be preferred (and would be eligible for the title, Assistant Research Professor). Knowledge of or experience with the criminal justice system, especially cases of wrongful conviction; excellent research and writing abilities; prior experience conducting social science, legal, and/or journalistic research; demonstrated ability to work collaboratively and to manage multiple priorities and projects effectively; demonstrated ability to supervise junior staff; excellent judgment and professional discretion. Preferred: proficiency with SPSS and Excel; prior experience with large-scale quantitative or qualitative research projects.
Salary will be $44,000 on an annualized basis. Fringe benefits include retirement, health insurance, life insurance, and disability insurance.
Review of applications will begin March 10, 2010 and will continue until position is filled. Apply with equity / demographic information for position F9345Z online at jobs.gmu.edu. Send letter of interest, vita, official university transcript, samples of written work, and two letters of recommendation to: Professor Jon B. Gould, Director, Center for Justice, Law and Society, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, MS 6C7, Fairfax, VA 22030-4444. No emails please.
To learn more about Mason’s Center for Justice, Law and Society, visit http://cjls.gmu.edu.
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Jeff
Trust in government and real income increases
February 21, 2010 · Leave a Comment
![]()
The Monkey Cage has an interesting post on this relationship – here’s an excerpt:
Of course the economy is not the only important factor. But it gets far less attention than it deserves when the hand-wringing begins. So, sure, perhaps we can and should tinker with the political process. Clip lobbyists’ wings. Get leaders to make nicey-nicey with the opposite party. But the process is less important than outcomes. More people will trust the government again when times are good, even if government ain’t.
See the rest of the post here. I’d be willing to trust in government more for some real income increase – that and maybe changing a few other things that annoy me
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Data · Jeff · Policy · politics
Getting elected – what Google can do for you (or to you)
February 19, 2010 · Leave a Comment
Want to get elected? Get the power of Google behind you – just ask Scott Brown of Massachusetts. As elections become increasingly web dependent, Google is poised to be a power player and offers some compelling advantages given its top spot in the search engine marketplace. See more on this on Madisonian.net blog. Want more? Check out the Google Policy Blog’s top 5 strategies for political campaigns: Keep reading →
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Data · Jeff · Policy · Pop Culture · politics
Casual Friday: Dntel
February 19, 2010 · Leave a Comment
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Andy · Pop Culture
Freakonomics question – gender and driving
February 18, 2010 · Leave a Comment
The Freakonomics blog asks the question – why do men always seem to drive when they share the car with a woman? Some interesting comments ensue. For what it’s worth – if I am ever in a car with you (man or woman) and you are not a really, really awful driver, then I am completely willing to let you drive. People who know me will confirm this assertion.
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Jeff
Struggling with professional fees in chapter 11
February 16, 2010 · 2 Comments
As I continue to be woefully late on an essay on how to reform the review and awarding of fees to professionals in chapter 11 bankruptcy cases (don’t worry, Maryland J. of Bus. & Tech. Law–it’s coming!), I’m trying to think of other areas in which those who are billing for professional services don’t really have to “push their bills across the table to a real client” but to a stand-in for a real client. Lawyers who represent humans have to push their bills across the table (figuratively speaking) to those humans, who can then stare the lawyers in the eye and ask why the lawyers engaged in certain tasks. Lawyers who represent even fictional people, like corporations, have to push their bills across the table to a live corporate officer/manager, who likewise can look at the bills and ask hard questions. But lawyers who represent the debtor-in-possession or the creditors’ committee are representing fiduciaries, and those fiduciaries aren’t always all “across the table” in the same way that clients might be outside of bankruptcy. Do these professionals have to do more defensive lawyering than lawyers are doing if they’re not representing fiduciaries? Are lawyers who do class action litigation in the same boat? Any thoughts?
(Posted by Nancy Rapoport)
→ 2 CommentsCategories: Uncategorized
Unemployment is Only Part of the Problem
February 16, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Calculated Risk has an excellent graphic on the unemployment/underemployment/reserve labor force problem by income band.
Tell me a story about the political implications of this breakdown. My guess: big loss of seats at midterm. Check out the gradient on intrade’s “Republicans to control the House after 2010 elections” graphic.
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Andy · Policy · politics
CFP: Congress in the classroom
February 16, 2010 · Leave a Comment
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Andy · Grants · politics
Manage files with iPhone Explorer
February 14, 2010 · 1 Comment
Got an iPhone or iTouch? If so, then this application could help you organize. Here’s some copy:
Want to put your iPhone or iPod Touch in disk mode? Use an iPhone as a flash drive? iPhone Explorer is an iPhone browser for Mac that lets you browse the files and folders on your iPhone as if it were a normal USB flash drive or pen drive. You can use the very easy drag-and-drop methods to add or remove files and folders from the iPhone. Compatible with all iPhones and iPod Touches including the new 3GS and 3.0 firmware. Works with or without jailbreaking.
Don’t ask me what ‘jailbreaking’ means – I don’t know. Here’s the website for the iPhone Explorer and here’s an instructional video (below):
→ 1 CommentCategories: Jeff
Can the economic crises permanently affect behaviors and prospects?
February 14, 2010 · Leave a Comment
Of course it can … one need only consult parents, grandparents, or great-grandparents who came up during the Great Depression to witness such enduring behaviors. A recent study detailed in The Atlantic provides more systemic evidence:
But in fact a whole generation of young adults is likely to see its life chances permanently diminished by this recession. Lisa Kahn, an economist at Yale, has studied the impact of recessions on the lifetime earnings of young workers. In one recent study, she followed the career paths of white men who graduated from college between 1979 and 1989. She found that, all else equal, for every one-percentage-point increase in the national unemployment rate, the starting income of new graduates fell by as much as 7 percent; the unluckiest graduates of the decade, who emerged into the teeth of the 1981–82 recession, made roughly 25 percent less in their first year than graduates who stepped into boom times. Keep reading →
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Jeff · Policy · Pop Culture
Computational Social Science
February 13, 2010 · Leave a Comment
From the inbox:
The Computational Social Science Society – CSSS
Dear colleague,
We are pleased to announce the establishment of the new Computational Social Science Society (called CSSS, or “C-triple-S”), officially registered in Washington DC on 16 December, 2009, as a 501 (c)(3) scientific non-profit professional organization to serve members in the field of computational social science. This new organization originated at the last meeting of NAACSOS, when the gathered members unanimously moved to establish the new CSSS and elect officers to provide for continuity of leadership and build on NAACSOS’ best past accomplishments.
* President: Claudio Cioffi-Revilla, George Mason University ccioffi@gmu.edu
* Vice-President: William Griffin, Arizona State University William.Griffin@asu.edu
* Secretary: Charles Macal, Argonne National Laboratory macal@anl.gov
* Treasurer: Corinne Coen, Case Western Reserve University cac155@case.edu
* Executive Director: Jim Hightower, California State University, Fullerton jhightower@fullerton.edu
* Newsletter Editor: Douglas A. Samuelson, InfoLogix samuelsondoug@yahoo.com
* Membership Coordinator: Michael North, Argonne Laboratory north@anl.govSeveral efforts are currently underway and additional information will be available soon:
* A new CSSS website is being developed
* CSSS will hold its annual conference on November 5-6, 2010, at Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, including keynote speakers, papers, posters, and the annual CSSS membership meeting—save the dates!
* Membership will be available in various categories (individual professional, student, institutional, corporate, etc.)
* A Newsletter will disseminate information about events, publications, and other items of interest to the community
* A new Journal is being developedCSSS President Claudio Cioffi is working with the leadership group and volunteers on these and other initiatives for the purpose of providing membership services as early as feasible. Additional information will be provided as it becomes available. We thank you for your interest and support, hoping to see you at the 2010 Annual Conference of the CSSS in November!
—Washington, DC, February 11, 2010
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Andy · Methods
Poverty and Public Policy
February 12, 2010 · Leave a Comment
A request in the inbox:
Dear colleagues,
We would like to kindly ask for your signature in support of the establishment of a Poverty and Public Policy Caucus to be registered as one of the independent groups related to the American Political Science Association. This effort comes in conjunction with the launching of one of our newest journals, Poverty and Public Policy, under the editorship of Dr. Max Skidmore at the University of Missouri at Kansas City, and published for us by Berkeley Electronic Press. The journal is available online at www.psocommons.org/ppp
Having an organized group around the topic of Poverty and Public Policy will enable us to have panel allocations and other events at the annual meetings of the APSA, which we hope will in turn raise awareness and increase the flow of material concerning public policy and its key role in fighting poverty worldwide.
If you are a registered APSA member and wish to add your signature in support of establishing the Poverty and Public Policy Caucus, please send an email with your contact information to Dr. Skidmore at skidmorem@everestkc.net
Sincerely,
Dr. Paul Rich
President
Policy Studies Organization
Washington DC
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Andy · Policy
Job Opportunity – Director of Research
February 11, 2010 · Leave a Comment
Hat tip to Malia Reddick (Director of Research & Programs, American Judicature Society) on this recent opportunity with the University of Denver: Keep reading →
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Jeff
What lessons Lady Ga Ga and Britney Spears can teach you to improve your troubled marriage on Valentine’s Day and why Barack Obama and Sara Palin are both to blame
February 10, 2010 · Leave a Comment
Of course, nothing in the title of this post makes any sense – unless you’re trying to get readers to email your post to their friends — or so you might think. However, the New York Times reports on a recent study which suggests that internet readers may have more refined tendencies when it comes to what they email to their friends and colleagues: Keep reading →
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Jeff · Pop Culture
Video upload from my mobile phone – ice creek
February 8, 2010 · Leave a Comment
Just humor me – I’m working on a way to upload video from my mobile phone – enjoy the winter scene.
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Jeff
Sneaking in professional responsibility in my Contracts course
February 7, 2010 · Leave a Comment
Last week, for the first time since I became a lawyer, I filed an ethics complaint against another lawyer. It was one of the most difficult things I’ve ever done (and I’ve done some doozies). Afterwards, I talked about the process and the reasons why I filed the complaint to my first-year students.
It was interesting to see their reactions. We spoke about the need to return clients’ phone calls promptly, and we spoke about why, when a lawyer says she’s going to do X if Y doesn’t happen, she has to follow through on that promise.
I spend a lot of time talking about the practice of law with my students (and not just in my PR course). I don’t want them to get the idea that PR is something that one takes in law school and only thinks about during the course, and I want them to think about the challenges that they’ll face as lawyers.
Will the state bar do anything about the complaint that I filed? I don’t know. But watching the process from this close up will be an education for me.
(Posted by Nancy Rapoport)
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Academia · Law · Methods · Nancy Rapoport
There’s an App for that: Introducing Siri
February 6, 2010 · Leave a Comment
Siri is the new virtual electronic personal assistant. Many have tried before to create such an animal, but this one actually seems to push us closer to having something useful. Check out more on Siri (free, by the way) on Fast Company, or just check out the video below. [hat tip to Rachel Miller].
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Jeff
Introducing guest blogger Nancy Rapoport
February 6, 2010 · 1 Comment

Nancy Rapoport
Please join us in welcoming guest blogger Nancy Rapoport to the Voir Dire Blog. She is the Gordon Silver Professor of Law at the UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law and was formerly professor and dean of the University of Houston Law Center and the University of Nebraska College of Law. She has authored entirely too many articles and books to list here, but you can see them by checking out her UNLV web page. She is also an avid internet writer, posting on a variety of blogs, including her own. I could be wrong, but I am pretty sure that she is the only guest blogger we’ve had on Voir Dire to have credits on the Internet Movie Data Base (for her work on “Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room”). Finally, it is reported that she is an excellent ballroom dancer. We look forward to reading her posts
→ 1 CommentCategories: Jeff
DIY Tax Auditing Prediction
February 3, 2010 · Leave a Comment

In 2006, they published a page on the IRS.gov website that details exactly how they determined which tax returns to audit. It comes down to these four main ways (for individuals):
- Computer Scoring – I listed this one first because it’s the most interesting of the four reasons. Tax returns are “scored” using two systems – Discriminant Function System (DIF) and Unreported Income DIF (UIDIF). The Discriminant Information Function System (DIF) score gives the IRS an indication of the potential for change in tax due, based on past IRS experience. The Unreported Income DIF (UIDIF), as you can imagine, scores the return on the potential for unreported income. The higher the score, for either, the more likely the return will be reviewed.
- Information Matching – This is an obvious reason because it’s the easiest to catch. The IRS receives the same W-2s and 1099s that you do, so it’s trivial for them to compare the two totals. If they don’t match, they investigate.
- Related Examinations – Beware who your friends/business contacts are! If their returns are audited and their return includes transactions with you, your return may be audited as well.
- Potential participants in abusive tax avoidance transactions – The IRS may get information about promoters of and participants in various schemes and select a return for audit based on that information.
For those interested in a more scientific approach, see this classic in the JEL from Andreoni, et al.
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Andy · Law · Policy
New Datasets at ICPSR
February 2, 2010 · Leave a Comment
Of interest to those working in our area:
24641 Annual Survey of Jails: Individual Reporting-Level Data, 2007
26382 National Crime Victimization Survey, 2008 [Record-Type Files]
26521 National Corrections Reporting Program, 2004 [United States]
26601 Impact Evaluation of Youth Crime Watch Programs in Three Florida School Districts, 1997-2007
26602 Census of Jail Facilities, 2006
27002 Firearm Injury Surveillance Study, 1993-2007 [United States]
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Andy · Data
Cool graphic on the State of the Union Address
February 1, 2010 · Leave a Comment

State of the Union Message Wordle
Courtesy of the LA Times. [Hat tip to Enik Rising]
“You see, it’s about the PEOPLE and the AMERICANS …” Perhaps I should start issuing a wordle from my lectures – but I’d be afraid that the big words would be “um” and “well”
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Jeff · Presidency
Scholarly productivity study – the other schools
February 1, 2010 · Leave a Comment
While most studies on scholarly productivity of law schools focus on the top 20 or so, a new one examines schools outside of the top 50. Here’s the top 10 of the “out of the top 50″ group, (based on articles in top journals, 1993-2009):
1. University of San Diego
2. Florida State University
3. University of Richmond
4. University of Missouri-Columbia
5. Illinois Institute of Technology (Chicago-Kent)
6. University of Nevada-Las Vegas (tied)
6. Case Western Reserve University (tied)
8. University of Cincinnati
9. Brooklyn Law School
10. Pepperdine University
See the rest here. hat tip – Leiter Law School Reports
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Academia · Jeff · Law
Check out our Social Vibe Widget
January 31, 2010 · Leave a Comment
On the right — you can do some simple (and free) online activities to help the cause — it just takes a few minutes.
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Postdoc at WUSTL Law
January 28, 2010 · Leave a Comment
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Academia · Andy · Law
Which cities have the most depressing local news?
January 27, 2010 · Leave a Comment
Asylum.com has a pretty interesting listing here. The ‘misery index’ is all about category of story:
The substance of the local evening news from the first full week of the New Year (Jan. 4-8, 2010) boiled down to the 10 categories of stories from accidents to crime to weather. Based on those categories, we created a “Misery Index,” which accounted for how depressing each category is, and the percentage of time each broadcast devoted to each category.
For example, here is how New York City (#8, tied with Washington, DC) breaks down:
The rankings after the jump:
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Jeff
Next Generation Workshop focusing on Environmental, Social and Governance
January 26, 2010 · Leave a Comment
All expenses paid for selected grad students!
Keep reading →
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Andy · Conferences · Law
CQ custom publishing
January 25, 2010 · Leave a Comment
Bring the entire CQ Press collection to your computer. Browse, search, and read title after title, whenever you want. Be green. Be smart. Be efficient. And be kind to your students’ wallets.
- e-Comp—why wait to get an examination copy? Get online and you’re a click away from an entire bookshelf of CQ Press books.
- e-Book—offer your students the inexpensive option of an online subscription to a CQ Press college text. They can take notes, highlight, bookmark, and print out.
- e-Custom—build your ideal book. Choose just the chapters you want and forego those you don’t want to assign. You can mix and match across our publications, as well as add your own content.
Choose your preferred format: print or online. Custom publications can be printed in just two weeks once an order has been placed; online books are available immediately.
Anyone planning on using it? Think it will catch on?
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Academia · Andy
Latest data on capital punishment
January 25, 2010 · Leave a Comment
• In 2008, 37 inmates were executed: 18 in Texas; 4 in Virginia; 3 each in Georgia and South Carolina; 2 each in Florida, Mississippi, Ohio, and Oklahoma; and 1 in Kentucky.
• 36 executions were by lethal injection; 1 by electrocution.
• Of persons executed in 2008, 20 were white and 17 were black. All 37 inmates executed were men.
• Thirty-seven states and the federal government had capital statutes at yearend 2008.
• As of November 30, 2009, 48 executions had been carried out, 12 more than the number executed as of the same date in 2008.
• Between 1977 and 2008, 7,658 people have been under sentence of death. Of these, 15% were executed, 5% died from causes other than execution, and 38% received other dispositions.
• A total of 111 inmates were received under sentence of death during 2008, representing the smallest number of admissions since 1973.
• A total of 119 inmates were removed from under sentence of death—37 were executed and 82 were removed by other methods, including sentences or convictions overturned, commutations of sentence, and deaths by means other than execution.
And lest we forget how important capital punishment studies have been in advancing political science, an oldie-but-goodie from Bob Erickson
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Andy · Courts · Data · Law
Crime Against People with Disabilities
January 25, 2010 · Leave a Comment
Findings in this report are the first estimates of crime against people with disabilities measured by the NCVS, administered by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). The NCVS adopted questions from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) to identify respondents who had a disability. Disability is defined as a long-lasting (six months or more) sensory, physical, mental, or emo- tional condition that makes it difficult for a person to per- form daily living activities. The NCVS questions identified six types of disabilities: sensory, physical, cognitive func- tioning, self-care, go-outside-the-home, and employment.
And they find:
Persons age 12 or older with disabilities experienced approximately 716,000 nonfatal violent crimes and 2.3 mil- lion property crimes in 2007 as measured by the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). Nonfatal violent crimes include rape, sexual assault, robbery, aggravated assault, and simple assault. Property crimes include household burglary, motor vehicle theft, and property theft.*
About one third (34%) of the crimes against persons with or without a disability in 2007 were serious violent crimes (rape/sexual assault, robbery, or aggravated assault). Per- sons with disabilities were victims of about 47,000 rapes, 79,000 robberies, 114,000 aggravated assaults, and 476,000 simple assaults.
Here’s a lit review on crime against people with disabilities, albeit with a Canadian angle.
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Andy · Data · Law
A goodbye to Conan O’Brien
January 23, 2010 · 2 Comments
We will miss your late night antics Coco
Whatever one might think of the whole situation, I felt that this was a nice farewell speech.
→ 2 CommentsCategories: Jeff
Law students as entrepreneurs?
January 23, 2010 · Leave a Comment
See my post on this idea and legal education on prawfs.
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Academia · Jeff · Law
Air America, RIP
January 22, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Air America files for Chapter 7.
What’s the outcome? I doubt much of an impact. The footprint was too small (unless counting satellite radio), and the listener base too mobile to worry about that media source. Of course, this all part of larger and broader themes in communications, including delveraging among larger media shops and continued failures of papers. The papers get the coverage, while the smallish radio stations fly under the radar.
Who’s next?
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Andy · politics
What are corporations anyway?
January 22, 2010 · Leave a Comment

In light of the US Supreme Court’s recent pronouncement on the entity known as the corporation in Citizens United (see our prior post here), we might pause to think more about what a corporation really is – where did it come from, how does it fit into our present society, what are its characteristics, and how is it different from a natural person? A 2003 documentary, “The Corporation” may provide some insight. I recently watched it and found it very intriguing, although it certainly has a very specific view on the topic. Here’s the trailer:
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Courts · Jeff · Law
Surf’s up! SCOTUS overturns campaign spending limits
January 21, 2010 · 1 Comment
The 5-to-4 decision was a doctrinal earthquake but also a political and practical one. Specialists in campaign finance law said they expected the decision, which also applies to labor unions and other organizations, to reshape the way elections are conducted.
→ 1 CommentCategories: Andy · Courts · politics
Conference on Path Dependency
January 21, 2010 · Leave a Comment
From Polmeth:
That path dependence is a key feature of complex human systems is now well-recognized by students of politics and other social sciences. How best to model path dependence both mathematically and statistically is a matter of debate. This small, select conference will bring together scholars and graduate students who are producing models of path dependence and/or attempting to fit these models to data. The objective is to stimulate conversations, future exchanges and eventually new work on this topic.
The conference is sponsored by the National Science Foundation under the auspices of the Political Methodological Society. Additional support will be provided by the Center for the Study of Complex Systems at the University of Michigan and the Department of Political Science at the University of Minnesota. The dates of the conference are tentatively set for June 4 and 5, 2010. Papers will be presented and discussed on Friday afternoon the 4th and most of Saturday the 5th. There will be a dinner for conference participants on Friday evening. All coach travel and local expenses will be reimbursed. If accepted, all participants must submit a short, at least 4 to 5 pages, think piece on the topic for circulation to the participants at least 1 week prior to the conference. Advanced graduate students are encouraged to apply.
Interested scholars should send a one paragraph proposal to John Freeman (freeman@umn.edu) and John Jackson (jjacksn@umich.edu) by Feb. 20, 2010. Invitations will be issued by March 15, 2010. Questions about logistics should be sent to Freeman.
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Academia · Andy · Conferences
Obama’s appointments – not fast
January 20, 2010 · Leave a Comment
![]()
Well, at least not as fast as the Bush Administration.
The Bush team, after a transition shortened by hanging chads and such, managed to fill 348 of 508 positions (just under 69 percent) that were tracked by the Brookings Presidential Appointee initiative. Seventy-two more people had been nominated for such jobs — which did not include ambassadors, U.S. marshals, judges or federal prosecutors — for a grand total of 420 folks.
The Obama team ended the year with 305 of 515 similar appointees confirmed (just under 60 percent), with an additional 91 nominated but not confirmed by the Senate, according to The Washington Post’s interactive Head Count feature online.
More interesting:
More than half of Obama’s picks (56 percent) are inside-the-Beltway types. The second-largest groups come from California and New York (each with 7 percent), while Obama’s home state of Illinois ties Massachusetts for fourth with 3 percent.
The Obama appointees generally have substantial government experience, with about two-thirds having most recently worked in the federal government, academia or think tanks (among which the Brookings Institution leads with seven appointees), the House or Senate (evenly split between the two), and state governments. The other third came from the private sector, including 34 from law firms.
You’d think that an incoming administration would know how important it is to hit the ground running. We’ve only been talking about it for years.
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Andy · Presidency
Bar Prep on the iPhone
January 20, 2010 · Leave a Comment
![]()
TUAW complains is excited about the new $999.99 BarMax CA app for the iPhone, which is
designed to help would-be lawyers pass their bar exams. Comparable services cost up to three or four times the price of this one, so if you have an iPhone and are planning to take the bar, this could actually be a “bar”gain (sorry, please don’t sue us). The app is over a gig in size and brags about squeezing 50 lbs of books into the palm of your hand — there are test questions, reference guides, audio lectures, and practice cards all included in the app’s purchase.
Next up? The American politics comps app.
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Academia · Andy · Law
How to spend a sabbatical [and a new blog comments policy]
January 20, 2010 · 2 Comments
[First, an announcement - we are experimenting with a new comments policy whereby you no longer have to register with wordpress to leave a comment - only a valid email. We'll see how this works - hopefully it will facilitate a more interactive experience here on Voir Dire]
On Prawfs, fellow guest blogger Lyrissa Lidsky asks an excellent question – what is the best way to spend a sabbatical? Obviously, the wise-guy answer is ‘on the beach with a martini,’ or something like that, but – contrary to what some may think – it is my belief that most (emphasis on *most*) academics earnestly want to make the time worthwhile from a work-product perspective. In many political science departments there is an expectation of grant writing during sabbaticals, but the expectation is usually fairly vague and some departments may not even have this expectation.
Here’s my comment on the Prawfs post – and then some questions for our readers:
I’m not an authority on this matter since somehow in doing this academic thing since 1997 I haven’t yet had a sabbatical (long story), but I’ll offer up something along the lines of what Rick Bales said – you might want to consider this time for learning and developing new skill sets. I have no idea what those skill sets might be for any given individual, but it (a sabbatical) can be a good time for making an effort to push your comfort zone and think outside of the box. This might entail learning a new language or studying your doctrinal field from a comparative perspective, or it might be learning computer applications that would aid your practice area – I don’t know – but I think that something like this may have more long term benefits than writing another article or two.
So readers, what are the expectations or guidelines for sabbatical leave in your academic institution? Are there specific policies? How do you plan to spend (or have already spent) your sabbatical?
→ 2 CommentsCategories: Academia · Jeff
college sports subsidization
January 14, 2010 · Leave a Comment
We’ve touched on this topic before, but USA Today has a really interesting story on it, so we’re talking about it more – see my post on prawfsblawg here.
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Position announcement – Georgia State University
January 11, 2010 · Leave a Comment
(from Law & Courts listserv)
The political science department at Georgia State University is currently searching for a Lecturer. Our Lecturer positions are structured differently than is typical at most universities. Essentially, they are tenure track in everything but name. Lecturers are members of the department in full standing. They have the same claim to seniority, office space, votes on departmental issues, and most other things as tenure track faculty members (although there are a few administrative privileges/responsibilities which apply to tenure track faculty but not Lecturers.) The position is, with rare exception, automatically renewed for five years. After five years Lecturers can go up for promotion to Senior Lecturer, which is roughly equivalent in rank to Associate Professor. The primary differences between a Lecturer and a tenure track faculty member are that (1) Lecturers teach a 3-3 load, rather than 2-2, and (2) there are no research expectations of a
Lecturer. Our department currently employs one Senior Lecturer and three Lecturers.
We have received only a very small number of applications for this position as of now. The position will remain open until it is filled, but the review of applications will begin on January 22nd. Thus, anyone wishing to be considered for this job (which is a pretty good one in this job market) should send in their materials ASAP.
→ Leave a CommentCategories: Academia · Jeff
